Italino Manio Sonio is a Tyrant?

Italino Manio Sonio is a Tyrant? Lets examine the facts.

The tyrant, on the other hand, rules solely for his own benefit and pleasure. -- Aristotle

“Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms.” -- Aristotle

“When the tyrant has disposed of foreign enemies by conquest or treaty, and there is nothing to fear from them, then he is always stirring up some war or other, in order that the people may require a leader.” -- Plato

Tyrant apply and implement the following three fundamental principles.

1. Tyrant divides the people which ever way she/he pleases. Example: Divide Hindus into warring Castes, Divide Indians on religion basis or Language basis or Regional basis.
2. Tyrant befriend with Foreigners only and dislike to make friendship with Natives.
3. Tyrant disarm people, make wars and create disturbances to divert peoples attention.

That is how a Tyrant rule over majority. 81% Hindus are ruled by single Italian Christian White Women with the help 19% minority by dividing majority into warring (self-hating) Castes.

Identify the nature of the "tyrannical personality": Since the tyrant is subject to completely unlimited desire, he/she can never be satisfied with anything he/she has.

Mysteries are the ways of Tyrants. A Tyrant can kill husband/wife for political gains. A Tyrant can also kill the powerful opponents and can prove that it was just a accident. Two dynamic Congress Party leaders and challengers were killed mysteriously. They are Rajesh Pilot and MadhavaRao Scindia. Whole nation thought one of them can be the next Prime Minister of India. But they both died mysteriously one after another in a shot span of time. How it is possible? Did the idiotic Indians can ever ask this question? How can two main competitors to Italino Manio Sonio die in the accidents one after another mysteriously? Rajesh Pilot died on June 11, 2000. And MadhavaRao Scindia died in 2001. And three of her opponents were thrown out of the Party. Who are they. They are Sharad Pawar, P.A. Sagma and Tariq Anwar.

We hear long stories of the Western policy of divide and rule and how it is being applied once again. We don't however hear reasons why after more than 300 years of colonial domination of one kind or another, we still have not learnt that unless a group is willing to be divided, nobody can divide them. What does that say about the intelligence of our leadership and so-called intelligentsia?

The British divided and ruled India because that is what Indians wanted them to do. That is why many Indians (Hindus, Sikhs, Maratha, Rajput Rajas, Muslims, Baniyas of Delhi and Afghans) supported the British with information, money and soldiers while their own compatriots died before British cannon on the walls of Delhi in 1857. And when the War of Independence was lost, they stood in line for Knighthoods, Rai Bahadur-hoods and other sundry 'honors' from their colonial masters, for having been good collaborators. And to this day, these worthies are not roundly cursed for being the traitors that they were. Instead we blame the British. My question is that when we know that it is the job of the enemy to divide and rule, why blame him for doing it? It was our job on the other hand, to remain united and not allow anyone to divide us, which we have not done. So whose fault is it if we are divided and then finished off piecemeal? But try telling that to our dear ones!!!